Friday, December 6, 2019

Movie Review: RAMBO: LAST BLOOD (2019) *** OUT OF ****

Released to a vicious critical response and disappointing box-office receipts, Rambo: Last Blood (2019), the fifth, and some say last, entry in the Rambo franchise, is a challenging film.

For die-hard fans of the character who have followed the series for almost forty years, Rambo: Last Blood is not an easy pill to swallow, let alone for casual viewers who are just after a solid, old-school action movie. The John Rambo featured here is an ageing, barely functional ex-soldier, trying to keep it together and not let the PTSD get the better of him. He has a surrogate daughter in the grandchild of his family's housekeeper, and he seems to have settled down into a steady, if uneasy life. Then the girl is kidnapped, and Rambo's life takes a tragically dark turn.

Stallone, who co-produced and co-wrote, takes a huge risk with this film. It's a dark, violent, slow drama, with much less action than one would expect from this type of movie. But, ultimately, it's a hugely rewarding risk. Stallone, aided by a solid cast and steady if conventional direction by Adrian Grunberg, chooses to tell a story that no one, not even the fans, expected; a downward spiral into despair, rage, and loss. Yes, there's a satisfying final battle, with plenty of gun play and a high body count, but that's not what makes the ending pack a punch. It's the cost that Rambo has to pay for survival and revenge, which Stallone plays beautifully, using his age-ravaged, scarred, and blood-stained face to say things that can't be said with words, in one of the best performances of his career.

The final shot, and a post-credit scene, hint at what might lie ahead for Rambo. But if this is the last we see of the character, then I can honestly say that the series ends on a hard-hitting, haunting, and dignified note.

Text © Ahmed Khalifa. 2019.

Watch the expanded video version of this post:

Monday, September 16, 2019

Movie Review: Killer Joe (2011) ** and 1\2 out of ****

William Friedkin is a master filmmaker. His mastery of technique and impressionist storytelling is evident in such masterpieces as The Exorcist (1973), Sorcerer (1977), and the much maligned Cruising (1980). But, in the past thirty years or so, his choices have been underwhelming at best, and mind-boggling at worst. Killer Joe (2011), Friedkin's second collaboration with playwright Tracy Letts after the unforgettable Bug (2006), is a film that is hard to like, but easy to watch.

The story, about a redneck Texas family that decides to enlist the services of a killer for hire, the titular Killer Joe - a corrupt Dallas detective who moonlights as a paid assassin - and then suffering the consequences of their choice, is compelling at first, thanks to Friedkin's sure hand, and a bevy of arresting performances by all involved, especially Emile Hirsch, Gine Gershon, and Juno Temple as the brain-damaged teen who is slowly revealed to be more than meets the eye. But as the film progresses, and Killer Joe, played with charming menace by Matthew McConaughey, starts to take over the story, scenes grow more and more incoherent and overwrought, till we reach a climax so hysterical and heavy-handed, that one is relieved when the credits roll and Clarence Carter's Strokin' starts to play.

It is obvious that Friedkin and company are having a blast with the pitch-black comedy of it all. But Friedkin is obviously not interested in reining in the story's excesses in favor of clear storytellling and believable characters. On the contrary. He seems to relish the story's over-the-top violence and characterizations, piling layer upon of layer of vulgarity and ugliness, scene after repetitive scene.

In the end, the point of the story, if there's any, is lost under the noise, blood, and gags, wasting a fine cast with it.

But that is not to say Killer Joe is a bad film. No, sir. It is a well-made, memorable movie, even entertaining, in its own twisted way. But it is also crass, loud, and ultimately underwhelming. Watch it at your own peril.

© Ahmed Khalifa. 2019.

Saturday, September 7, 2019

Review: Carrion. By Gary Brandner ** and 1\2 out of ****

Gary Brandner, the author of The Howling, one of the most entertaining horror novels to come out of the 1970's, is one of those authors that has an accessible, highly readable style that makes almost everything he writes fun to read.

Carrion is no exception. While it's not Bradner's best, this breezy read about a cheeky fortune teller who accidentally discovers that he has the ability to raise the dead, is sure to give you a few nights' entertainment. The main characters are likable, the prose unfussy, and the ending suitably tongue-in-cheek. Recommended.

© Ahmed Khalifa. 2019.

Review: The Shadow: Bells of Doom. By Walter B. Gibson ** out of ****

Serviceable The Shadow mystery, with intriguing Gothic overtones. But the convoluted plot and lack of a villain worthy of The Shadow's abilities, make it a forgettable entry.

© Ahmed Khalifa. 2019.

Friday, September 6, 2019

Review: The Shadow: Lingo. By Walter B. Gibson *** out ****

Layered, dazzlingly complex The Shadow mystery, which features some of Walter B. Gibson's best writing, and a plot so clever, it's almost a magic act. Typically, The Shadow stories fall into one of three categories: stories about small town crime syndicates, stories about a devious, almost omnipotent villain, and stories about organized crime. Lingo is arguably Gibson's ultimate tale about organized crime, with a large cast of characters, plenty of twists, and an ending that is sure to impress both die-hard fans and newcomers alike. Highly recommended.

© Ahmed Khalifa. 2019.

Saturday, July 27, 2019

Review: Z Nation: The Complete Series (2014-2018) ** and a 1/2 out of ****

Mostly known as a Walking Dead rip-off, Z Nation, a quirky and uneven series, is actually much more than that.

What begins as a silly, tongue-in-cheek horror/comedy show, ends as a politically charged apocalyptic thriller. Let's take a look at each individual season.

Season 1: Created by Karl Schaefer and Craig Engler, and hampered by a cast of actors who haven't yet found their groove and a ridiculously low-budget of a reported $700,000 per episode, the series nevertheless begins with a bang, delivering a quirky, funny, and action-packed pilot, and setting itself up as the anti-Walking Dead; irreverent, humorous, and silly. Throughout the first season, thanks mainly to some inspired twists and John Hyams' kinetic direction, the show tries to do its best with limited resources, and while the budget constraints make a couple of episodes almost unwatchable, overall, the season never stops being entertaining, and the ending is intriguing.

Season 2: Arguably the best season of the series, this is where the cast (especially the immensely funny Keith Allan), crew, and writers fire on all cylinders, delivering some of the show's best episodes, some of which are near-perfect exercises in zombie-action mayhem. Again, thanks to John Hyams' excellent direction, and some inspired touches by the writers, this is the season where Z Nation comes into its own and transcends both its origins and its genre. The ending is somewhat a letdown, but there is no doubt that this is the season where the show became something much better than it had any right to be, even rivaling the quality of some of the later seasons of The Walking Dead.

Season 3: Although the season begins with a fantastic, visually stylish two-parter, this is the season where things start to go awry. Here, the show's heavy handed politics start to rear its ugly head, with the humor and inspired quirkiness taking a backseat to uneven writing and some truly boring plotlines. Things pick up a bit near the end, but this is the season where Z Nation starts to lose its footing.

Season 4: An uneven season, again suffering from heavy-handed politics and some of the series' worst episodes. The opening and closing episodes are good, and the main storyline, about general Warren's recurring visions of bizarre apocalyptic events, allows fan favorite Kellita Smith to truly show her acting chops. The season finale, a thrilling and haunting episode, is a series highlight. An extremely uneven season, though.

Season 5: The nadir of the entire run of the series, it is here that the show's creators drop almost everything that made the show special, and turn it into a preachy, boring, and almost unrecognizable creation. Bad writing, uneven performances, and some truly nonsensical political proselytizing make this season a chore to sit through. Even Kellita Smith looks bored throughout the show, and the writers give the always reliable Keith Allan almost nothing to work with. Again, the ending is good, managing to be both uplifting and somber, but it isn't enough to recommend the entire season.

All in all, Z Nation is an interesting addition to the zombie genre, and with 69 episodes to go through, fans of the genre are sure to find plenty to enjoy, if they decide to stick with it and forgive it its numerous shortcomings, that is.

© Ahmed Khalifa. 2019.

Thursday, July 25, 2019

Book Review: The Bachman Books by Stephen King *** out of ****

As a huge Stephen King fan, I have to admit that, for me, early King is the best King. Books like Salem's Lot, The Stand, and Pet Sematary remain unparalleled in their ability to entertain, frighten, and transport. The Bachman Books, first published in hardcover in 1985, is an omnibus of the first four books King published under the pseudonym Richard Bachman. The books themselves were written in the late 1960's and early 1970's, at a time when King was, in his own words, "infatuated with the art and craft of writing."

Why King published these four books (and Thinner, which is not included in this omnibus) under an alias is a matter of debate, and King himself has always answered the question with cagey evasiveness. The short answer seems to be that King wanted to know whether he really was a good writer, or if his success was just a fluke and his name nothing but a comforting brand. The four novels included in this volume (Rage, The Long Walk, Roadwork, The Running Man) are somewhat uneven in quality, but King's unique and hypnotic voice is loud and clear, and the stories themselves are compelling and entertaining. But it is obvious why Bachman's tales never caught the public's fancy like the tales of uncle Stevie. Uncle Stevie's tales, with a few exceptions, like Pet Sematary, are dark but ultimately human and hopeful stories of good versus evil. Simply put, The Bachman Books are not.

Rage, the first one published under the Bachman name, and long out of print at King's request, is an addictive, immensely readable tale, but one which is also brutal, angry, and relentlessly nihilistic. Dealing with bullying, teenage sexuality, mental illness, parental abuse, and teen violence in schools, Rage is an almost overwhelming exercise in hopelessness and, well, rage, and the heavy-handed and immature writing doesn't help matters much. Its pitch-black ending, reminiscent of William Golding's The Lord of The Flies, is one of King's most pessimistic and grim. 

The Long Walk, the second novel published under the Bachman name, is, hands down, the best book in this collection, and an underrated masterpiece. Here King is at his most hypnotic and assured, taking a simple concept - in an alternate future where resources are scarce, male children between the age of 12 and 18 are encouraged to participate in The Long Walk, a contest in which one hundred boys embark on a never-ending walk, with the last one still alive getting whatever he desires for the rest of his life - and using it as an exercise in storytelling excellence. Although the dialogue is occasionally stilted, and the cast of teens sometimes act and talk a lot older than their age, this is a near-perfect novel; atmospheric, highly readable, and thought-provoking, with an ending that is nothing short of haunting.

Roadwork, considered by many, and at one time by King himself, to be the weakest Bachman book, is a touching, somber tale about a middle-aged man coming undone. Unable to deal with his young son's death, his failing marriage, and his house being torn down to make way for a new road, he starts down a path that ultimately leads to his destruction.

Roadwork is basically a psychological drama about one man's inability to let go, and the consequences of that failure. This is a loosely plotted tale, with enough incident and believable characters to make it enjoyable. But even though it remains compelling till the end, it's a predictable, straightforward story, and one which hasn't aged as well as other King books.

The Running Man, the fourth book to be published under the Bachman name, is arguably the worst of the Bachman Books. A superficial, slow-going tale of a dystopia where the poor are enlisted to participate in televised game shows that always end in death, The Running Man suffers from some of King's weakest, most heavy-handed writing, and an unlikable protagonist. Its saving grace is its brevity. It was very loosely adapted as a feature film in 1987, starring Arnold Schwarzeneger.

Taken together, The Bachman Books are a revealing look at Stephen King before he became a phenomenon. This is Stephen King at his rawest. It is also surprising how political these novels are, with every one of them dripping with working-class rage and bitterness, where every authority figure is a nasty villain, and every rich person is either corrupt or willfully unaware of the plight of the poor. King seemed to show more maturity and restraint as he grew older and more successful, but here, in this phase of his life, the rage, for better or worse, was palpable, and because of it, the writing was leaner, sparer.

Highly recommended for fans of King, or for readers who think King is nothing but a horror writer. Writing as Richard Bachman, King may not have sold as many books, but he sure as hell proved he could write anything he wanted, and write it well.

© Ahmed Khalifa. 2019.

Watch the expanded video version: